User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significa liberdade | 139 | 25 | 10 | 85 | Open | 22:18, 21 September 2024 | 1 day, 9 hours | no | report |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 88.244.91.47 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- 62.92.22.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- 165.166.60.131 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- 23.28.187.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Will Howard (American football) was changed by 23.28.187.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865728 on 2024-09-20T12:37:38+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 12:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 82.40.153.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Phil Collins: vandalism after final warning. Binksternet (talk) 06:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nabajyoti Kalita (Tihu) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects: account is being used only for promotional purposes. Nick Levine (talk) 07:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. We should try to educate after one attempt at self promotion (as opposed to paid-for SEO) and block if they continue. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, good point. Nick Levine (talk) 11:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Adoenis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Obvious block-evading sock of Potymkin. The sole purpose of this account was to vote in the RfC in Talk:Algeria, just like Potymkin's other sock, Asstrobot. Notice how the two write very similarly, e.g. lowercase letter following a full stop.[1][2] Skitash (talk) 10:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2A00:23C5:BA82:2101:C8B4:42B5:E72B:E037 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Annh07 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Deepaklohar7677 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Sjö (talk) 10:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2A02:C7C:F015:6100:78BC:31BB:D7BD:4F77 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) malicious edits against Timothy Everest
- 163.53.179.101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 12:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- 125.161.46.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning Renewal6 (talk) 12:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- 23.28.187.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Ryan Day (American football) (diff): vandalism after final warning. DB1729talk 12:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Limitless Production House (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 22:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. Nothing egregiously promotional just yet. Starting a discussion to see if we can head this off before it gets into block territory. Red Phoenix talk 23:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Gagbeetch (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Only edit so far was vandalism. Wikishovel (talk) 09:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Skidditoilet rizz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Zach (talk to me) 11:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aditya Group India (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (adityagroupindia.org). See User:Aditya Group India. Annh07 (talk) 12:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Traydstream Trade Finance (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WiiUf ——The dragon travels through the stars 12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Long-term IP and SPA vandalism. Skitash (talk) 21:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Some of those involved, especially recently, are autoconfirmed. Do you want extended-confirmed protection? Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nationwide opinion polling for the 2024 United States presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Consistent editing by an IP user to change table averages to use mid-range values despite most users using arithmetic mean, and talk page discussion to build consensus around this. This occurs several times a day (15 in the previous 24 hours).
There has also been some recent vandalism. 103.8.18.128 (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Content Dispute and Disruptive Editing WP:CT/AP 2601:282:4700:272:EC:9C58:DF8D:4A7B (talk) 23:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Could WP:1RR be enforced here please? IanDBeacon (talk) 01:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of edit warring. The talk page suggests that some of the edits are based on WP:OR. Argenator (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- It seems like the same users are edit warring in Alberta New Democratic Party over the same thing. Argenator (talk) 00:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP Vandalism Cactoideae (talk) 01:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs returned again with the dispute over highest grossing film. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP changing vandal who considers the mention of a non-binary character to be "hateful vandalism". soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: repeated vandalism. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 10:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially User:Lee xxx, who has been warned already. Lectonar (talk) 11:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- The registered user has already been warned, but they are not the only one to have engaged in disruption. An IP did too. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 11:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive IP and sockpuppet activity. Various SPAs attempt to vote in the ongoing RfC on the talk page, disrupting the consensus-building process.[3][4][5][6][7] Skitash (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Sebbog13 (talk) 10:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has been disrupted by various IPs for months. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: I hope it can be pointed out on the discussion page that the explosive devices were not limited to Gold Apollo; devices from the well-known Japanese company Icom Incorporated also exploded. 58.152.168.150 (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change the "mainly Hezbollah members" note on the casualties to "mainly civilians" as a large swath of Hezbollah casualties were apart of their political wing and considered civilians under international law, as well as ensuring the hundreds of medical staff who use pagers and were injured are not ignored. By simply stating that the majority of casualties were apart of Hezbollah, is suggests that the majority of casualties were non-civilian, which is inherently incorrect as stated above. It is imperative that this fact be clarified to prevent misinformation and further demonization of Lebanon.
Furthermore, it must be stated clearly and constantly that not only were the vast majority of the victims civilians, but that such an attack is, by definition and intent, a terror attack on Lebanon by israel (as israel has now confirmed they were behind it and had been planning it for an unspecified length of time). The severity of the attack in the context of international law must also be stated clearly as this is a clear violation of the Geneva Convention and general international law that protects civilians from attack and prohibits the use of terrorism a a legitimate manner of warfare.
For evidence to the above claims, see https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/9/18/israels-war-on-gaza-live-thousands-injured-in-lebanon-pager-explosions in which multiple quotes from israel, Hezbollah, the Lebanese Health Ministry, the UN, and various other third-parties with weight on the issue can be found and used to validate the above claims. Against the Empire (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Mainly Hezbollah members" should be changed to "mainly civilians"
- I am not aware of a single reliable source that has confirmed that most of the casualties were civilian. This is also something that I doubt will come to light very quickly, since Hezbollah generally does not like publishing lists of their soldiers, so discerning who is and isn't a soldier is extremely difficult. Hezbollah themselves claiming that "most casualties were civilian" is not evidence, as Hezbollah is not a reliable source on this matter, since they are known to regularly lie for propaganda purposes.
- And suppose that we did have a reliable source claim that most casualties were civilian. This would still not change the fact that most reliable source primarily describe the casualties as "mainly Hezbollah members" and only talk about civilians second. The article must reflect the style of reliable formats, so it cannot assign more importance to their civilian status than their Hezbollah membership unless reliable sources also do so.
- Medical staff should not be ignored
- They are not ignored. Such information is mentioned under the "Casualties" section. Admittedly, this section could be expanded, and it probably will be with time.
- Calling casualties mainly Hezbollah members suggests they are not civilians
- No it doesn't. The interested reader is free to visit the Hezbollah article and read about their organization. It is not Wikipedia's job to correct every single possible misunderstanding that a reader might have at every possible moment.
- This demonizes Lebanon
- No it doesn't. There is no reason that the article's failure to clarify the exact makeup of the casualties should lead readers to conclude that Hezbollah is evil. And even if it does, this won't lead to the demonization of Lebanon, but that of Hezbollah.
- And besides, it's not Wikipedia's job to prevent demonization. And even if it were, the change you suggest would lead to much more demonization of Israel than it would prevent demonization of Hezbollah, so the net change would be more demonization in the world.
- It must be stated clearly and constantly...
- No it shouldn't. That would be annoying to read.
- Israel has now confirmed they were behind it
- Where did you read this? It's news to me. You should really cite a source here, it would make a great addition to the article.
- Dieknon (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
(I did not put the talk page by mistake in the page title field, that was intentional)
Add topic about the sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" in the third paragraph of the article, with the next paragraph as the body of the topic:
The sentence "It is not clear if only Hezbollah members were carrying the pagers" appears to contradict other pieces of information in the article, specifically that two children died from the explosions. Hezbollah doesn't seem to have a history of using child soldiers in any capacity. The reported ages of the children who died seem to be around the range of 8-11, so I think it's safe to assume that the children who died were not members of Hezbollah. The size of the explosions wouldn't of been enough to kill someone without being in close proximity to it (its not like the pagers had a blast radius of several hundred meters), which implies that the children were either holding the pager or in close proximity to the pagers. Therefore, it can be assumed that non-Hezbollah members were carrying pagers. Granted, I doubt these children were carrying around a pager wherever they went, but they must've been relatively close to it in order to be killed by the pager (as in, holding or carrying the pager).
The reason why I'm saying to add a topic to the talk page instead of just "remove this sentence from the article" is because it's debatable if it actually does contradict, and I'd prefer to get some consensus about it beforehand. I can't request an edit of the article on the talk page due to it being protected, so I can't just use the edit request to gauge consensus on this issue. This could also very well be considered WP:OR, I'm of the opinion that "the explosive that requires one to be close to it to hurt them implies that people who were hurt by it were close to it" would fall under WP:CALC, but I could see consensus going either way on this. AlexChillOut (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Here is a source used two sentences later in the same article for the claim about the children who died: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd7xnelvpepo
- Also, here is a source to show the range of the explosives, it can be seen in the video that they have a rather short range: https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/lebanon-pagers-attack-hezbollah/index.html
- That video is already uploaded to Wikipedia, and can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CCTV_video_of_pager_explosion_in_a_Beirut_market.webm
- The rest is mainly these two pieces of information put together, a pager killing a child implies the child was close enough to it to be injured; based on the range shown in the video, they were likely holding it. The source that is cited for the sentence I believe should be removed adds that it was not *immediately* clear, not that it's unclear now (https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/dozens-wounded-after-pagers-detonate-lebanon-officials-point-113754464) AlexChillOut (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Found another source, this one states that "[s]he picked up the device to bring it to her father and was holding it when it exploded, mangling her face and leaving the room covered in blood". Safe to assume she was not a Hezbollah member, as she was 9 years old. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/18/world/middleeast/lebanon-funeral-pager-attack.html AlexChillOut (talk) 02:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2024_Lebanon_pager_explosions#cite_note-13
[edit]Remove ", including at least 12 civilians" in second sentence. The citation links to an ABC News article which says that "At least 12 civilians were killed and at least 2,800 people injured in the explosions that took place Tuesday, according to Lebanese authorities." However 12 is the total number of people that were reported killed from the Tuesday explosions, not the number of civilian casualties. 104.246.129.48 (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Admin,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request the creation of a Wikipedia page for ನಮ್ಮ ನಾಡು ನಮ್ಮ ಆಳ್ವಿಕೆ, This cause is highly significant in Karnataka political movement.
Overview of ನಮ್ಮ ನಾಡು ನಮ್ಮ ಆಳ್ವಿಕೆ : The Nanna Nadu, Nanna Alvike (My Land, My Rule) movement is a significant political struggle in Karnataka that represents the voice of regionalism, local governance, and the rights of the people of Karnataka. This movement focuses on regional issues, advocating for local autonomy, safeguarding the state's resources, and upholding regional pride.
Objectives
1. Regional Autonomy: The movement emerged in response to certain decisions by the central government, advocating for the protection of Karnataka’s autonomy and regional political rights.
2. Justice and Development: It emphasizes the fair use of Karnataka’s local resources and economic wealth to benefit the state's citizens.
3. Regional Pride: Alongside preserving the Kannada language, culture, and traditions, the movement demands that the people of Karnataka should have full control over their land and resources.
Origins and Developments The movement began on 25th August 2025 and has gained momentum through various popular protests across the state. With the slogan Nanna Nadu, Nanna Alvike, the people are voicing their demand for their rightful governance.
Political Impact This movement has added a new dimension to the discussion of regionalism in Karnataka politics. It strives to prioritize internal development for the state, with various political parties and leaders lending their support, signaling a potential shift in the political landscape of Karnataka.
Key Messages 1. Local Governance: The state's resources and wealth should be used solely for the comprehensive development of its people. 2. Cultural and Moral Authority: The responsibility to protect Karnataka’s culture, language, and traditions lies with its people.
Social Response The Nanna Nadu, Nanna Alvike movement has garnered widespread support from people across all sections of society in Karnataka. It has sparked important discussions about the state’s internal governance and development.
Significance The Nanna Nadu, Nanna Alvike movement symbolizes the determination of the people of Karnataka to claim their regional rights and autonomy. It reflects a broader political and cultural struggle to reassert the state's regional identity and self-governance.
I have gathered relevant materials and references to support this request and would be happy to collaborate on this project. Please let me know the appropriate steps or additional information needed to proceed.
Thank you for your consideration, and I look forward to your guidance on moving forward with this request.
Best regards, Shivanand Gundanavar 8867734326 shivanand087 Shivanand087 (talk) 12:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Start date - 25-08-2024
- Articles link
- https://vijaykarnataka.com/news/karnataka/political-party-which-is-committed-to-karnataka-and-kannada-language-lovers-meeting-on-august-25-in-bengaluru/articleshow/112260915.cms
- https://twitter.com/karnatakaparty1
- https://knnkrushisamaya.com/2024/08/namma-naadu-namma-alvike-regional-political-party-shyama-journalist/
- https://pisumathu.in/news/12/
- https://kn.vikaspedia.in/education/cb6c95ccdcb7ca3cbfc95-c85ca4ccdcafcc2ca4ccdca4cae-cb0cc2ca2cbfc97cb3cc1-caaca6ccdca7ca4cbfc97cb3cc1/ca8caeccdcae-ca8cbeca1cc1-ca8caeccdcae-cb9cc6caeccdcaecc6-c88-cb9ca4ccdca4cbfc97c82ca6cc1-cb9ca4ccdca4c97cc6
- https://basavamedia.com/kannada-vichara-sankirana-bangalore/
- https://karnatakabala.blogspot.com/
- https://www.prajavani.net/district/bengaluru-city/thorn-to-the-constitution-from-narendra-modi-says-hamsalekha-2941642
- https://powertvnews.in/2022/01/15/our-country-is-our-pride/
- https://www.udayavani.com/news-section/nri-news/it-is-our-responsibility-to-save-and-develop-the-country-gopal-shetty
- https://kannada.asianetnews.com/state/music-composer-hamsalekha-speech-about-kannada-paksha-at-bengaluru-rav-sirtww
- https://theprint.in/ground-reports/digital-guardians-of-kannada-are-waging-a-new-language-war-in-karnataka-against-hindi/2265851/
- https://www.prajavani.net/news/karnataka-news/karnataka-needs-a-kannadigas-party-2941521
- https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x94o9do Shivanand087 (talk) 12:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 19 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for accountcreator |
|---|
Account creator[edit]
Returning from a wiki-break, former ACC. Happy to help with the backlog. TiggerJay (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I would like to introduce an exceptional editor and author with a amazing track record in editing and article creation. Created 182 articles, none of which have been deleted, with the majority focusing on BLPs. Nice editor, and it’s clear that he is one of the editors for whom this user right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Of course, I am ashamed that I have not yet made 400, 300 or even 150 articles and most likely will never make that many. But I can say in my «defense» that more than half of them are rare goods, they are world premieres. Before that, there were no such articles in Wikipedias. And I had to create Wikidata for many of them, categories on Commons and start from scratch. It is important for me to make articles in the English Wikipedia, because this immediately promotes a new topic to the whole world. --- - Names·nik·tlk 16:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
A good editor with a solid history of article creation, having created 135 articles, with only one being PROD’d in 2014 and another AfD’d in 2018. The other three deletions, which were G6 and G8, are not particularly significant. Since 2018, none of their articles have been deleted. Their article creation primarily focuses on BLPs, demonstrating their knowledge of notability guidelines. I don’t believe they would abuse the right, and granting it would help reduce the backlog. GrabUp - Talk 05:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
A good editor and content creator, they have created a total of 133 articles. One was deleted via G14 in 2022, and another was deleted via A3 back in 2014. Since then, they have created many BLPs and other topic articles, none of which have been deleted. I think they are good to go. GrabUp - Talk 16:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
 seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access for updating census data of highly populated Indian villages in Kerala state and other human settlements on this planet in future. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like access to AWB to fix CheckWiki issues more efficiently than I currently do using WPCleaner. I also want to streamline typo fixing as part of WP:TYPO. I understand I have been denied it twice in the recent past, but I strongly believe that I am fit for getting the permission now, as I gained significantly more experience and done more constructive edits. Bunnypranav (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like to use AWB's Checkwiki functionality to alter position of references with respect to punctuation and incorrect ISBNs as I am frequently revising pages that need reference issue support; use find and replace for music album title issues; and use AWB for assistance on creating and correcting items and links within categories of music genres, domestic flag information, and public parks. Thank you. Shotgunheist 💬 19:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Improve articles' layouts, correcting Spanish settlement infoboxes, changing IPA-va (depricated) to IPA|ca-valencia, adding IPA, correcting links, etc. I had AWB rights in the past, however I stopped using Wikipedia due to COVID-19. Now I am fully recovered and would like to carry on improving things here and there. Thank you. Nuvolet (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Nuvolet (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Requesting access to clean up a relatively long list of redirects that were left after a page move. RachelTensions (talk) 13:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Can i please have extended confirmed rights back. I lost it because one day when i had a little less than 500 edits, i made about 45-55 edits in one hour in order to get to 500 edits. Im new to this site and didn't know gaming edits was against the rules. Ever since i lost the extended confirmed thing, I've made hundreds of edits i think are constructive and i stopped vandalism a few times and have a much better understanding of the rules. extended confirmed rights HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I want to be able to branch out and explore different aspects of Wikipedia, as article creation does tend to get boring nowadays. I have made 340 pages, 4 of which were deleted (all 4 were from June or earlier). I have no track record of incivility that I am aware of besides a heated conflict back in April, and am a host at the Teahouse. I have commented or voted on ~45 AfDs, and have sent several of my articles through AfC, and I know how the policies work there. If possible, I'd also like to request just a 1-month trial, as I want to see what the tool is like before I commit to it. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am interested in helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and i think now I'm experienced in AFD, AFC and draftifications. Xegma(talk) 20:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have some experience in AfC and NPP that I believe would help me. {{The Sharpest Lives|💬|✏️|ℹ️}} 04:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I currently have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days and would like to continue patrolling new pages to help bring down the huge backlog. Ednabrenze (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing general maintenance tasks for a while now (despite some breaks in activity), and I would like the opportunity to further expand my skill set and help reduce the backlog of pages. Thanks! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I have some experience creating article and so far, I have been guiding new users to edit Wikipedia as well as reviewing their drafts. I will like to request the new page reviewer following my understanding of how it works (This took a while for me, however I am very good now following several trainings). Looking forward to my request been granted!. Tesleemah (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
I was hoping to participate in the NPP Sep. backlog drive, since I missed the last one. I have some article writing experience, and regularly interact with newcomers during RC patrolling. I also have a decent AfD nomination ratio, with the same being true of my CSD log. Overall, I think I would make a useful addition to the NPP team, and hope to be trusted with this responsibility. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Besides a few articles and redirects that I sometimes create, I often help others with improving and reviewing their drafts and newly created articles. If I could then mark the articles as reviewed and use the other review tools, this work would be even more effective. Thanks. Killarnee (talk) 17:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am adding request to become a New Page Reviewer on Wikipedia. I have been an active contributor to the platform for More than 3 years and have made significant contributions to various articles and other projects. I believe in my experience and understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines make me an ideal candidate for the New Page Reviewer role. please review my contributions and let me know if I meet the eligibility criteria for the New Page Reviewer role? I would appreciate your feedback on this matter. Thank you! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to request for NPP rights to help reduce the huge backlog of NPP reviewers. I have familiarized myself with the prerequisite required for this permission. I started to help out in draftspace of my interest, and noticed that there are quite of huge backlog that are pending review, in which only NPP reviewers are allowed to accept/reject it, I believed with my knowledge, I can volunteer to reduce it. Thank you for considering me. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 07:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting for Page Mover rights on Wikipedia. I have been an active contributor and have made significant contributions. I believe in my experience and understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 09:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
I occasionally rename new articles to fix poor titles. I also sometimes want to move new articles to draftspace. Generally, neither case needs a redirect for the old title. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm requesting the page mover permission to help deal with the backlog on Wikipedia:Requested moves, particularly the technical moves but also the requested moves with clear consensus. I have been participating in such discussions with some frequency for a while now, also suggesting the move of some pages myself (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc., all of them moved), and I believe my participation with this permission would be beneficial to the project, especially regarding the backlog, as previously mentioned. Sometimes I try to close obvious consensus, but without being a page mover, I cannot do so and have to rely on a page mover (e.g., 1, 2, 3). I have read the policy and, for what it's worth, I always adopt the maxim "if I am not sure, I won't do it" in my edits. Thank you, RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC) RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have 16 months experience in editing Wikipedia. I wish to contribute whole lot of my time for betterment of Wikipedia and reduce the backlog in all possible ways that I can. As an initial step towards it, I am applying for granting this user right, so I can use it to improve pages in Wikipedia. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello there, I'm requesting for permissions because I know it will save a lot of time my time to undo problematic edits. I have read the guidelines for how and when to use rollback so yes am ready. Cheers
I would like to have rollback because vandalism on wikipedia is always high and it is important to have people looking out for potential vandals, and lower this. I will not give mercy unless it is a good faith edit and will make sure to always warn users, as I am doing right now with the help of Ultraviolet. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have over 800 edits, most of which are on the main space. I am aware I have a somewhat lousy history with giving proper edit summaries, as i didn't fill out revision summaries, but I have tried to rectify it. I was also involved in a dispute which might have been classified as an edit war back in April. Other then that I have a clean slate. Thanks for considering. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
|
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 1 |
| Requests for unblock | 141 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 2 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 19 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 17 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 855 |
| Templates for deletion | 232 |
| Categories for deletion | 127 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 17 |
| All redirects for discussion | 519 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 34 |
| Possible copyright violations | 13 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 255 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 5 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 7 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 4 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 387 |
| Unknown copyright status | 40 |
| Unknown source | 25 |
| No non-free use rationale | 1 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 14 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 4 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,242 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 445 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,386 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,652 | 0.5 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 5,892 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,315 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 39,072 | 0.57 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 10,953 | 0.16 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 526,874 | 7.65 |
| All articles lacking sources | 83,034 | 1.21 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 701 | 0.06 |
| All articles needing additional references | 464,428 | 6.75 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,554 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,622 | 1.53 |
| All articles with dead external links | 305,900 | 4.44 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 144 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 18 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,660 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 808 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 8 | - |
| Stub categories | 19,235 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 1,032 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,794 | 0.8 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 2,745 | 0.04 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,455 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,740 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,580 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 294 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,665 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,766 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 3 |
| All articles to be expanded | 66,153 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||