Jump to content

Talk:House of Windsor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Duke of Sussex's father

[edit]

I don't know how to edit the pop ups on the family tree, but the one for Prince Harry currently states that he is the younger son of James Hewitt. Please can someone edit this asap?

Also, I guess, add in a box for Archie.

Charles III, Glücksburg or Windsor?

[edit]

Children of female monarchs take the house of their fathers, but Charles III is listed as part of Windsor on his page and the current head of house Windsor on the House of Windsor page, but then on the Glücksburg page he is listed as a currently reigning monarchs part of House Glücksburg. By all reasonable definition Charles is part of house Glücksburg. Currently we are at an impasse with contradicting articles. If female monarchs could pass on their house then the house of Windsor wouldn't even exist, this logic is insane. Personally I believe it is worth adding Glücksburg to Charles's page alongside Windsor, and mentioning this on the Glücksburg page and the Windsor page. Zenryzap (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"this logic is insane" No it is not? The United Kingdom has had several changes in its legislation concerning the reigning house and its succession since World War I. Dimadick (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Britain has changed succession laws to be gender neutral, changed their branch of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor, and changed the last name of the family to Mountenbatten-Windsor as far as I'm aware, what of that list would make Charles part of Windsor instead of Glücksburg? The best answer I've found says that he is indeed part of house glücksburg, but also windsor because Elizabeth II declared all monarchs descended from George V to be Windsor (is that really "legislation"), and one site said that this makes it a cadet branch, but i'm not entirely sure about that. Either way at least 1 article is wrong. I will admit calling it insane is harsh though. Zenryzap (talk) 04:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Royal.UK website directly addresses the royal house name, "Unless The Prince of Wales chooses to alter the present decisions when he becomes king, he will continue to be of the House of Windsor and his grandchildren will use the surname Mountbatten-Windsor." To my knowledge, no such change ever took place, so the official house is still House of Windsor. House name. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 05:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, on the Glücksburg page it mentions that charles III is only agnatically part of house glücksburg, and in a footnote it states that he reigns as house windsor, so does the windsor page, but Charles III's page doesn't mention Glücksburg at all. If both house pages are in agreement to mention charles's connection to the other house, then shouldn't charles's page include a section about his agnatic hertiage of glucksburg? it should at least be mentioned. Zenryzap (talk) 19:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If/until King Charles III decides otherwise, the British royal house is "Windsor". GoodDay (talk) 22:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then should he be removed from the glücksburg page? Zenryzap (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You'll have to ask, over there. GoodDay (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Children of female monarchs take the house of their fathers" assumes that all houses operate on the same, i.e. agnatic principles. I think it's clear by George V's 1917 proclamation, Elizabeth II's 1960 proclamation, and current practice that the House of Windsor doesn't currently operate on such principles entirely. Seltaeb Eht (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As long as there is genealogy as a recognized phenomenon, Charles will genealogically belong to the House of Oldenburg (Glücksburg branch). Officially Windsor. We'll have to wait till we hear from him re: any change in what the official dynasty is to be called now. I don't believe that has happened yet. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, there are no planned changes on the dynastic name. Charles' genealogy has no impact on any legislation on the matter. Dimadick (talk) 14:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Legislation? Who mentioned legislation? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Genealogically" part of the House of Oldenburg

[edit]

What's the meaning of a "genealogical" membership to a House? Does genealogy have its own secret, universal and eternal set of rules for stating which house a person belongs to, independently from the current rules of the land? Does a child always belong to his father's house, and never ever to his mother's, no matter what the current laws say, for genealogists? If so, is that relevant for this article? --MostroDellaLaguna (talk) 04:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]